Hegel and the Concept
of World History. Conference at Kingston U / London Graduate School, 14 /
15 April 2016. Online audio at Backdoor
Broadcasting Company.*
2016
Objektiver Geist occupies an intermediary
position in the general context of Hegel’s system. It was, however, a
late “discovery” encountered in a double exteriority, both outside the
subjective and separate from absolute spirit. Hegel’s passion for the
objective led to numerous returns to the system’s middle term to rework
and update its content. When this effort was interrupted by the
philosopher’s death, the first Hegelians took up the challenge to
furnish the system’s middle grounds with the philosophy of history and
other posthumous fragments of teaching or early writings. If the
Hegelian concept of objective spirit was developed on the grounds of
history, rather than political economy, is the concept itself
subject-specific? What does it cover, designate, constrain, impose, or
conceptualize? Is objective spirit still to be thought there, where it
imposed itself on Hegel, on the first Hegelians, and on later ones
(Left, Right and Centre)? This two-day conference seeks to address
questions arising from the concept of world history in relation to the
form, function, and content of objective spirit as presented in the
Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences and Elements of the
Philosophy of Right.
Plenary speakers
Plenary speakers
- Stefania Achella (University of Chieti, Pescara & Ecole Normale Supérieure of Pisa)
- Myriam Bienenstock (University Francois-Rabelais, Tours)
- Paolo Diego Bubbio (Western Sydney University)
- George di Giovanni (McGill University)
- Bruno Haas (University of Dresden) —and we begin with:
- Jean- Francois Kervégan (University of Paris I, Pantheon-Sorbonne) - Philosophy of History - Kant vs. Hegel.
—oOo—
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Se aceptan opiniones alternativas, e incluso coincidentes: