Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Situaciones. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Situaciones. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 11 de enero de 2024

Parts and Persons

 The everyday dramatism of the social actor according to Robert Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy:

 

It is not worth, virtue (that's bonum theatrale [a theatrical good], wisdom, valour, learning, honesty, religion, or any sufficiency for which we are respected, but money, greatness, office, honour, authority; honesty is accounted folly; knavery, policy; men admired out of opinion, not as they are, but as they seem to be: such shifting, lying, cogging, plotting, counterplotting, temporizing, flattering, cozening, dissembling, "that of necessity one must highly offend God if he be conformable to the world," Cretizare cum Crete [to do at Crete as the Cretans do], "or else live in contempt, disgrace, and misery." One takes upon him temperance, holiness, another austerity, a third an affected kind of simplicity, whenas indeed he, and he, and he, and the rest are hypocrites, ambidexters, outsides, so many turning pictures, a lion on the one side, a lamb on the other. How would Democritus have been affected to see these things!

To see a man turn himself into all shapes like a chameleon, or as Proteus, omnia transformans sese in miracula rerum [who transformed himself into every possible shape], to act twenty parts and persons at once for his advantage, to temporize and vary like Mercury the planet, good with good, bad with bad; having a several face, garb, and character for every one he meets; of all religions, humours, inclinations; to fawn like a spaniel, mentitis et mimicis obsequiis [with feigned and hypocritical observance], rage like a lion, bark like a cur, fight like a dragon, sting like a serpent, as meek as a lamb, and yet again grin like a tiger, weep like a crocodile, insult over some, and yet others domineer over him, here command, there crouch, tyrannize in one place, be baffled in another, a wise man at home, a fool abroad to make others merry.

To see so much difference betwixt words and deeds, so many parasangs betwixt tongue and heart, men like stage-players act variety of parts, give good precepts to others, [to] soar aloft, whilst they themselves grovel on the ground.

To see a man protest friendship, kiss his hand, quem mallet truncatum videre [whom he would like to see decapitated], smile with an intent to do mischeif , or cozen him whom he elogiums; his enemy, albeit a good man, to vilify and disgrace him, yea, all his actions with the utmost livor and malice can invent.

To see a servant able to buy out his master, him that carries the mace mor worth than the magistrate, which Plato, lib. II de leg., absolutely forbids, Epictetus abhors. An horse that tills the land fed with chaff, an idle jade have provender in abundance; him that makes shoes go barefoot himself, him that sells meat almost pined; a toiling drudge starve, a drone flourish.

To see men buy smoke for wares, castles built with fools' heads, men like apes follow the fashions in tires, gestures, action; if the king laugh, all laugh: 

Rides? majore cachinno

Concutitur, flet si lacrimas conspexit amici?

[Should you smile, a heartier laughter shakes his sides; he sees you weep, and tears drop from his eyes.]

Alexander stooped, so did his courtiers; Alphonsus turned his head, and so did his parasites. Sabina Poppaea, Nero's wife, wore amber-coloured hair,so did all the Roman ladies in an instant, her fashion was theirs.

To see men wholly led by affection, admired and censured out of opinion without judgement: an inconsiderate multitude, like so many dogs in a village, if one bark, all bark without a cause as fortune's fan turns, if a man be in favour, or commended by some great one, all the world applauds him; if in disgrace, in an instant all hate him, and as the sun when he is eclipsed, that erst took no notice, now gaze and stare upon him.

(...)

("Democritus to the Reader," 65-66)




What's the Market? —What's the World?

—oOo—

lunes, 25 de julio de 2016

(Не)определение реальности

В этой статье я предлагаю один из возможных подходов к определению реальности. Реальность – это то, что случается между строк. Иными словами, реальность состоит в интеракциональной игре между общими для всех фреймами события (теми "строками", которые обозначены бесспорно) и другими фреймами, которые, будучи действительными для некоторых участников, как правило, недоступны для остальных. Реальность является игрой реальностей – эксплицитной и неявной, скрытой или альтернативной – которые сосуществуют в какой-либо конкретной ситуации. (Перевод с англ. Муравьевой Л.Е.)



English Abstract:  

The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight

I shall put forward here a definition of reality, or perhaps a particular take or perspective on reality. Reality is what happens between the lines. Or again, reality is constituted by the interactional play between shared frames of action (those "lines" which are unproblematically on the page) and other frames which, though they may be active for some of the participants, are not generally shared. Reality is a play of realities — the explicit one, and other secret, discreet or alternative realities which coexist in any given situation. (Russian translation by L. E. Muravieva).

Note: Downloadable document is available in Russian.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 9
Keywords: Interactionalism, Frame theory, Perspectivism, Philosophy, Topsight, Narratology, Reality, Social behaviorism, Interpretation
Reference Info: OpeNarratology (March 16, 2016)

  

eJournal Classifications (Date posted: June 23, 2016)
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
AARN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
            
CSN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
    
        




(Не)определение реальности: 





Also here:

_____. "(Не)определение реальности: изменение рамок восприятия и спор за контролирующую перспективу." [The (In)definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight]. Trans. Larissa Muravieva. OpeNarratology 16 March 2016.*

https://www.opennar.com/singlepost/2016/03/16/Неопределение-реальности-изменение-рамок-восприятия-и-спор-за-контролирующую-перспективу

   http://www.opennar.com/accueil/author/%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5-%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%85%D0%B5%D0%BB-%D0%93%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B0-%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0-(Jos%C3%A9-%C3%81ngel-Garc%C3%ADa-Landa)

         2016 DISCONTINUED 2020

_____. "(Не)определение реальности: изменение рамок восприятия и спор за контролирующую перспективу (The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight)." Trans. Larissa Muravieva. Social Science Research Network 23 June 2016.*

         http://ssrn.com/abstract=2799319

         2016

         Psychological Anthropology eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Psychological-Anthropology.html

         2016

         Cultural Anthropology eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Cultural-Anthropology.html

         2016

         Cognition&Culture … eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Cognition-Culture.html

         2016

         Philosophy of Action eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Philosophy-Action.html

         2016

         Epistemology eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Epistemology.html

         2016

         Social & Political Philosophy eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Social-Political-Philosophy.html

         2016

         Continental Philosophy eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Continental-Philosophy.html

         2016

         Philosophy of Mind eJournal 23 June 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Philosophy-Mind.html

         2016

_____. "(Не)определение реальности." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 25 July 2016.*

         http://vanityfea.blogspot.com.es/2016/07/blog-post_25.html

         2016

_____. (Не)определение реальности: изменение рамок восприятия и спор за контролирующую перспективу." Trans. Larissa Muravieva. Academia 7 April 2017.*

         http://www.academia.edu/32313018

         2017

_____. (Не)определение реальности: изменение рамок восприятия и спор за контролирующую перспективу." Trans. Larissa Muravieva. ResearchGate 8 April 2017.*

         https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315824336

         2017

_____. "The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight."  Online at Wixstatic.com.*

https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/3b11da_36190c7dd7e34db78be52587391d4d3d.docx?dn=In-definition.docx

         2021

_____. "The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight." Social Science Research Network 13 April 2016.*

         http://ssrn.com/abstract=2763243

         2016

         Cognition & Culture… & Semiotics eJournal 2 May 2016 (13 April 2016).*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Cognition-Culture.html

         2016

         Philosophy of Action eJournal 9.11 (19 April 2016).*

         http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/IssueProof.cfm?abstractid=2763243&journalid=1001534&issue_number=11&volume=9&journal_type=CMBO&function=showissue

         Online 13 April 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Philosophy-Action.html

         2016

         Metaphysics eJournal 9.11 (19 April 2016).*

         http://hq.ssrn.com/Journals/IssueProof.cfm?abstractid=2763243&journalid=950386&issue_number=11&volume=9&journal_type=CMBO&function=showissue

         Online 13 April 2016.*

         http://www.ssrn.com/link/Metaphysics.html

         2016

_____. "The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 27 April 2016.*

         http://vanityfea.blogspot.com.es/2016/04/the-indefinition-of-reality-reframing.html

         2016

_____. "The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight." Academia 9 April 2017.*

         https://www.academia.edu/32351646/

         2017

_____. ""The (In)Definition of Reality: Reframing and Contested Topsight." ResearchGate 10 April 2017.*

         https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315840394

         2017

  

—oOo—

domingo, 29 de diciembre de 2013

La definición de la situación


(del libro Symbolic Interactionism, de Joel M. Charon, p. 136).

William y Dorothy Thomas (1928) escribieron "Si [la gente] define las situaciones como reales, son reales en sus consecuencias" (p. 572). Lo que quieren decir es sencillo: los seres humanos actúan en un mundo que definen ellos, y aunque pueda haber de hecho una realidad ahí afuera, la definición que ellos le dan es mucho más importante para entender lo que ellos hacen. En última instancia no importa si eres un canalla o no; lo que importa es que te veo como un canalla, y actúo contigo como si lo fueses. Y tú, a tu vez, puede que no seas un canalla, pero puede que aceptes mi definición de tí como canalla, y pasas entonces a actuar en consecuencia. Si veo una situación como amenazadora, entonces actuaré acorde con ello, aunque la gente que está en esa situación no tuvieran la intención de comportarse de manera amenazadora. Si defino a la escuela como difícil, o buena, o estúpida, entonces actuaré hacia la escuela de esa manera, aunque otros no lo vean como yo, y sin importar si en realidad es más dura, mejor o más tonta que otras escuelas. Las definiciones de la situación pueden verse influidas por los demás, pero en última instancia cada individuo ha de definir la situación (incluyendo a esos otros) emprendiendo una actividad mental. Cada uno de nosotros actuamos en un mundo que creamos mediante la interacción con nosotros mismos, influida en parte por la interacción con los otros.

______

Aquí habría que pasar a estudiar, claro, la composición ideológica del sujeto individual que genera estas definiciones de la situación. Lo que aquí se presenta como una evaluación o interpretación individual es más colectivo o social de lo que podría pensarse. Tampoco estaría de más prestar más atención a cómo se negocia con los demás la definición de la situación en la que nos encontramos, o cómo se hereda, sin más.

Pero la definición personal de la situación es una cuestión de gran interés para el estudio de la realidad como realidad interaccional, es decir, como realidad virtual construida colectivamente y mentalmente. Por eso hay dioses, etc., y tienen efectos aquí sí y aquí no—como hay modas, o modales, variables de una persona a otra. Es una perspectiva sobre nuestra realidad como realidad virtual y perspectivística (siguiendo a Montaigne y a Hamlet), construida no por el lenguaje común sino por nuestras interpretaciones individuales de la realidad y de las perspectivas sobre ella que los demás nos ofrecen, nuestras reacciones a las mismas. También tiene gran relevancia para reflexionar más sobre el papel de la atención en la construcción de la realidad. La construcción social de la realidad, y la personal.





Mi fotoblog

Mi fotoblog
se puede ver haciendo clic en la foto ésta de Termineitor. Y hay más enlaces a cosas mías al pie de esta página.