Handbook of Narrative Analysis

Me citan en este manual de narratología:

De Fina, Anna and A. Georgakopoulou, eds. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Chichester: Wiley, 2015.* Online at King's College Research Portal.*

         https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/84786115/

         2021

 

—oOo—

Manual de Teoría de la Literatura

 

Este manual de teoría literaria está completo en Academia. Y me citan —Libro recomendado sobre teoría de la narración:

Cabo Aseguinolaza, Fernando, and María do Cebreiro Rábade Villar. Manual de Teoría de la Literatura. (Castalia Universidad). Madrid: Castalia, 2006. Online at Academia.*

         https://www.academia.edu/43137909/

         2020

 

—oOo—

Me citan en STUDYING ENGLISH LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE

de Rob Pope:

The Restoration to 1800

A History of English Literature

Es el manual que más utilizan mis estudiantes de literatura inglesa. Y aquí está electronizado en Academia.edu—aunque no precisamente en el sitio de su autor.

Michael Alexander,  A HISTORY OF ENGLISH LITERATURE


—más de 6000 visitas tiene, claro.

 

______

PS, 2024: Desaparece de ahí... pero aparece en el Internet Archive: 
 

The Short Oxford History of English Literature

El manual de Andrew Sanders The Short Oxford History of English Literature está en PDF en esta dirección (una página árabe):

http://lanquiz.org/assets/pdf-books/lanquiz.org__the_short_oxford_history_of_english_literature.pdf

El libro tiene 678 páginas, y el PDF 396 (Está todo el texto principal aunque faltan las bibliografías e índices finales). Es la primera edición, de 1994, luego revisada.

The Cambridge History of English and American Literature (ed. Ward & Waller)

 

—oOo—

Wikipedia como libro de texto

Nos pasa Norman Holland este mensaje a una lista, de Jeremy Butler. Sobre el uso de Wikipedia para elaborar manuales para los estudiantes. Copypasteo:

This morning I was playing around with a relatively recent Wikipedia feature
that allows you to assemble up to 500 pages of articles into a "book". You
can then download that book as a PDF or you can pay to have it printed and
shipped to you.

This got me to thinking: Would this be a useful ancillary product for a
(TV-studies) textbook?

Fr'instance, I'm currently revising *Television: Critical Method and
Applications* (Routledge, 2011). Here's how I might put the Wikipedia book
feature to use:

1. I could search for all the terms in the *TVCM&A* glossary. Then I could
collate them into a single PDF file and post it on the companion Website.
Users could access it through a browser and/or download it to their own
computers and/or electronic readers.

This would be a *searchable* PDF, thus allowing students/teachers to buzz
through the PDF and find additional info on the glossary terms.

2. A similar PDF file could be compiled with all the proper-name (people,
companies, TV shows, etc.) articles.

'Course, users could just search Wikipedia directly for this information and
find more up-to-date articles and Wikipedia is not 100% accurate; but it
seems to me that it still might be handy to have all that info collated into
one PDF.

Another feature that the Wikipedia book function offers is the ability to
pay to have the collection itself printed. I don't know if a printed
collection of articles would be a useful supplement to a textbook or not,
but it's a pretty cool concept.

I'd be curious to hear the thoughts of TV/film studies teachers. Would you
and/or your students use this material if it were made available at no cost?

P.S. It's perfectly legal to make such quasi-commercial use of Wikipedia's
articles. They're all published under a Creative Commons "share and share
alike" license. That is, you can use them pretty much as you wish, as long
as you don't try to copyright them as your own work and restrict others' use
of them.

A mí me parece buena idea —un "trayecto guiado por la Wikipedia" mejor para muchos fines que el mero uso de la Wikipedia cada cual a su aire; más centrado, sobre todo una vez el profesor conoce bien el material que pasa. Pero no evita (sino que más bien contribuye a) el síndrome que nos aqueja: el uso de Wikipedia como fuente no ya preferente, sino muchas veces única, por parte de los estudiantes.  A mí me parece excelente la Wikipedia, les digo a los míos, y les estimulo a consultarla, pero que también consulten libros y otras fuentes. Lo que tiene un toque siniestro es la imposición, aunque sea mediante brote espontáneo, de un Liber Mundi como fuente única.

Pibo y el urbanismo mcdonaldizado