Donde se me cita, o a mí o a Derrida:
Kalra, Siddhant. (Indian Institue for Human Settlements). "Indian Law, Hinduism, and Orientalism: Mapping Discourse in Oriental Scholarship." Online at Academia.*
https://www.academia.edu/30476636/
2020
—oOo—
Fernández, José Francisco. "Irish Studies in Spain – 2007." Estudios Irlandeses 3 (2008): 166-85.*
https://www.estudiosirlandeses.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/IStudiesinSpain3.pdf
2020
—oOo—
Me citan en este artículo sobre el ballet La Pudeur des icebergs:
Cauthery, Bridget E. "'Bodies of Uncharted Ice': Daniel Léveillé's La pudeur des icebergs." Performance Research 18.6 (2013): 122-28.* Online at Taylor and Francis 2 May 2014.*
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13528165.2013.908067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2013.908067
Online at Academia.*
https://www.academia.edu/20931622/
2020
O me citaban. Bueno, ahí sigue.
Lesic-Thomas, Andrea. (U of Sarajevo). "Trauma, intimna sjecanja, problem autenticnosti i fotografije Milomira Kovacevica, Sarajevo dans le coeur de Paris." Sarajevo Sveske 29/30 (2017).*
http://sveske.ba/en/content/o-prirodi-nostalgije
2020
Online at Academia.*
https://www.academia.edu/11140122/
2020
En enero de 2018, sin pandemia ni mascarillas por la calle: 48.000 muertos. Un gran número de ellos, por afecciones cardiorrespiratorias, y octogenarios. COMO AHORA. https://t.co/fdBTErMAaK
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 14, 2020
En el puerto mauritano más cercano a España. Búsquenlo ustedes mismos. En la tele no se lo enseñarán.
—oOo—
A ver, atención a esto. La conexión entre el fraude electoral americano, VENEZUELA, y.... (tachán).... la empresa INDRA creada para amañar elecciones. SON LOS QUE NOS CUENTAN LOS VOTOS A NOSOTROS, CON LA DEJACIÓN CÓMPLICE DE LA JUNTA ELECTORAL CENTRAL que NO HACE RECUENTO OFICIAL https://t.co/Ity4wjFjfA
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 13, 2020
— sangarro 🇪🇸 (@santigarob) November 13, 2020
Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the great 18th Century fashion for epistolary literature. From its first appearance in the 17th Century with writers like Aphra Behn, epistolary fiction, fiction in the form of letters, reached its heyday in the 18th Century with works like Clarissa by Samuel Richardson. At over a million words, it's a contender for the longest English novel. It inspired impassioned followers such as Denis Diderot who described reading Richardson's novels like this:
“In the space of a few hours I had been through a host of situations which the longest life can scarcely provide in its whole course. I had heard the genuine language of the passions; I had seen the secret springs of self-interest and self-love operating in a hundred different ways: I had become privy to a multitude of incidents and I felt I had gained in experience.”
This sense of the reader gaining a privileged peek into the psychology of the protagonists was a key device of the epistolary form and essential to the development of the novel. Its emphasis on moral instruction also propelled the genre into literary respectability. These novels were a publishing sensation. Philosophers like Rousseau and Montesquieu took up the style, using it to convey their ideas on morality and society.So why was letter writing so important to 18th Century authors? How did this style aid the development of the novel? And why did epistolary literature fall out of favour?With John Mullan, Professor of English at University College London; Karen O’Brien, Professor in English at the University of Warwick; and Brean Hammond, Professor of Modern English Literature at the University of Nottingham.
University of Nottingham.
¿Alarmismo xenófobo o verdaderos motivos para entender que estamos ante una invasión migratoria planificada? pic.twitter.com/srGYEMnaYw
— David Arranz 🇪🇸 (@DavidArranzVox) November 12, 2020
Les falta la mascarilla. La mascarilla del Régimen. https://t.co/MZEpIprXQO
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 12, 2020
¿QUÉ HACE ESTA SIN 'MASCARETA'? PARA MÁS CARETA LA VUESTRA. LEYES VENDO Y PARA MI NO TENGO. CLARO QUE A VUESTRO IMBÉCIL PÚBLICO SE LE PUEDE ENGAÑAR ASÍ, A CARA DESCUBIERTA.
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 10, 2020
CONTRA LA MASCARILLA OBLIGATORIA, INSTRUMENTO CLAVE DE LA DICTADURA SANITARIA; HERRAMIENTA Y UNIFORME DEL 'NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL' Y DE SUS AGENTES 2030,
—PARA LA MANIPULACIÓN IDEOLÓGICA DEL ESPACIO PÚBLICO,
— PARA VISIBILIZAR EN TU CARA —EN TU CARA— EL ALARMISMO MANIPULADOR QUE SIRVE DE EXCUSA PARA TODOS LOS DESPROPÓSITOS SOCIATAS, MIENTRAS SE LO LLEVAN CRUDO.
— Y PARA TAPAR LAS BOCAS. QUE PARA ESO ESTÁ.
HASTA LOS COJONES YA DE LA MASCARILLA MANIPULADORA, QUE ESTO PARECE YA EL GOLFO PÉRSICO. Y VA CAMINO DE SERLO.
SI EL GOBIERNO TE DICE QUE EL CORONAVIRUS SE CONTAGIA POR LOS OJOS —cosa que no me invento yo— Y QUE POR TANTO TIENES QUE ANDAR POR LA CALLE CON LOS OJOS CERRADOS....
.... ¿VAS A ANDAR POR LA CALLE CON LOS OJOS CERRADOS?
¿NO?
PUES ÁBRELOS YA.
—oOo—
¿"Sacudido por Trump?" ¿Que no para de firmar acuerdos de paz entre árabes e israelíes? ¿Obama no sacudía, con sus drones y bombardeos y su ISIS, verdad? PERO QUE INFECTO PERIODISMO.... —SOIS BASURA, ¡¡¡BASURA!!!
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 10, 2020
Lo País saca bulos contra el Expediente Royuela. Sin nombrar (por supuesto) ni a Mena ni a Villarejo ni a Belloch ni a Robles ni al PSOE. Es todo una 'trama rusa', o de bots, o de box, o de algo. https://t.co/zYb1aUXhqE
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 10, 2020
En todo caso está claro que alguien ha visto la necesidad de apagar fuegos preventivamente, no vaya a ser que se enciendan. Un servicio más del País al País, en la línea de lo que suele hacer.
—oOo—
A Jano García: A la vez crees que no ha habido manipulación, pero constatas la mentira organizada y sistemática de los grandes medios sobre Trump. Entonces, CLARO QUE HA HABIDO FRAUDE. Es que no hace falta llenar las urnas de votos falsos para dar un pucherazo: se llenan solas.
— JoséAngelGarcíaLanda (@JoseAngelGLanda) November 9, 2020
De quien me estoy leyendo Galgo Corredor, muy recomendable.
Arranca una nueva web y lo hace con esta entrevista... Opiniones contundentes: las mías. Léanlas si así lo desean esbozando una sonrisa en el ojo de la mente. @RinconBravio https://t.co/uBmISlXcy3
— Fernando Sánchez Dragó (@F_Sanchez_Drago) November 7, 2020
El Diestro. Opinión de derechas, [Nov 8, 2020 at 09:37]https://t.co/be6BXKXPGc
— alejandra (@alejand31578852) November 9, 2020
No dejes que te engañen con una noticia FALSA, lo diga quien lo diga, Joe Biden NO es Presidente de los EEUU
https://t.co/zaXjJeejfa pic.twitter.com/qTrYcZjRaD
Con la anuencia del Gobierno nos invaden. Y no son ni viejas ni niñas muertas de hambre ni mujeres que huyen de la guerra—de esas míticas guerras que se supone que nos mandan refugiados. No: son todo maromos bien lucidos, en edad militar, y al cabo de la calle de lo que vienen a hacer. Y sólo lo denuncia Vox.
‼️ Más de 1.100 inmigrantes ilegales han llegado este sábado a Canarias, la cifra más alta en una sola jornada desde 2006.
— VOX 🇪🇸 (@vox_es) November 8, 2020
Ni mascarilla ni toque de queda ni confinamiento. Acaban en hoteles con todos los gastos pagados.
¡Paremos la invasión!https://t.co/p3u5ZjQYPJ
Since when does the Lamestream Media call who our next president will be? We have all learned a lot in the last two weeks!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 8, 2020
From Paul Cantor's Shakespeare and Politics, 2 series of lectures on Henry V.
1st series, 3 videos:
Second series, 4 videos:
—oOo—
Shakespeare. Hamlet. TV drama. (TVE, Estudio 1, 1960s). Trans. and adapt. Antonio Gala and Claudio Guerin Hill. Cast: Emilio Gutiérrez Caba, María Luisa Ponte, Fernando Cebrián, Alfonso del Real, Gerardo Malla, Fabio León, Maribel Martín, Music: Miguel A. Tallante / Pro Musica Antiqua de Madrid. Sets by Jaime Queralt. Lighting by Ricardo Torres. José María Lucena, Valentín Conde, Víctor Gabirondo, Pedro Valentín, Andrés Mejuto, José Carabias, Manolo Calvo, José Ramón Pardo, Alberto Fernández, Jacinto Martín, Maite Tojar, Pedro Sempson. Prod. Ramón Salgado. Realizador, Enrique Carriedo. Assistant, Juan Mediavill. Prod. Televisión Española. Dir. Claudio Guerin Hill. YouTube (A.T. King Productions) 2 May 2014.*
2020
From The Norton Anthology of English Literature 7th ed.:
TOM STOPPARD
b. 1937
Tom Stoppard was born in Czechoslovakia, emigrated to Singapore (where his father died), and came to England in 1946. On his mother's remarriage, he took his stepfather's name of Stoppard. Leaving Pocklington School in Yorkshire at seventeen, he became a journalist, wrote a novel, and in 1962 his two short plays, The Dissolution of Dominic Boot and M Is for Moon among Other Things, were broadcast on the radio. The British theater had been dominated for a decade by realistic "kitchen sink" dramas when Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (1966) appeared and was hailed as a major theatrical event. Critics recognized a debt to Waiting for Godot, but where Samuel Beckett had focused on the hopelessness of his two abandoned characters, Stoppard celebrates the gaiety and perverse vitality that can be generated from despair.
Stoppard frequently uses plays by other playwrights as launching pads for his own. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern step out of the shadows of Shakespeare's Hamlet, and the plot of Stoppard's Travesties (1974) is entwined with that of Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. Past and present are again entwined, though not intertextually, in his masterpiece, Arcadia (1993), which explores the nature of Nature, Classical and Romantic theories of landscape gardening, literary history and historians, truth and time, and the disruptive influence of sex on human orbits—"the attraction which Newton left out." Stoppard's most recent plays have been Indian Ink (1993) and The Invention of Love (1997), which brings together in one galaxy A. E. Housman, Moses Jackson, Oscar Wilde, and a sparkling constellation of High Victorian worthies.
In a different but no less witty mode, The Real Inspector Hound (1968) parodies the classic country-house murder-mystery play. Stoppard's hilarious spoof parallels Agatha Christie's play The Mousetrap. An extratheatrical dimension is added by the subplot satirizing the pomposities of theater critics. When the lives of Birdboot and Moon become entangled with those of the characters in the play they are supposedly reviewing, we are treated to a brilliant demonstration of one of Stoppard's recurrent themes, the indistinct frontier between Life and Art. He has said:
I write plays because writing dialogue is the only respectable way of contradicting yourself. I'm the kind of person who embarks on an endless leapfrog down the great moral issues. I put a position, rebut it, refute the rebuttal, and rebut the refutation.
Stoppard shared an Oscar for the screenplay of Shakespeare in Love (1998) and has also written for radio and television, alternating—sometimes in the same work—between a serious handling of political themes and arabesques of exuberant fantasy. As he says, "I never quite know whether I want to be a serious artist or a siren."
—oOo—
Algunas reflexiones sobre (auto)engaño e ideología por vía de un comentario sobre el libro Ideología de Teun A. van Dijk. Los poderosos engañan. Creen tener un acceso privilegiado a la realidad, y utilizan esa perspectiva dominante ('topsight') para dominar. Con frecuencia para dominar engañando. Pero también se engañan — los económicamente poderosos e incluso los poderosos de mente — porque su perspectiva supuestamente dominante no es tal, o es sólo parcialmente dominante, pues hay vías de acceso a la realidad y aspectos de la realidad que escapan al control de las mentes más vigilantes, y de las mejor y de las peor intencionadas.
Texto completo:
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3687931
English abstract: The Powerful Delude (Themselves)
Some reflections on ideological delusion by way of a comment
on Teun A. van Dijk's Ideology. The powerful delude others. They believe
they have a privileged access to reality, and they use that top-sight
or dominant perspective for the purpose of domination. Often enough for
domination though delusion. But they also delude themselves — this is
the case with the economically powerful as well as with the mentally
powerful — because their supposed top-sight is not such, or at any rate
it is only a partially dominant perspective, as there are ways into the
real and aspects of reality which escape the control of the most
vigilant minds, whether their intentions are benevolent or self-seeking.
| eJournal Classifications | |
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
|
|
PRN Subject Matter eJournals ![]() |
|
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
|
|
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
|
|
PRN Subject Matter eJournals
|
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 4 Sept. 2010.* (Van Dijk, ideology, intellectuals, critical thinking)
http://vanityfea.blogspot.com/2010/09/los-poderosos-se-enganan.html
2010
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." Ibercampus (Vanity Fea) 3 Sept. 2020.*
https://www.ibercampus.es/los-poderosos-se-enganan-40050.htm
2020 – DISCONTINUED 2024 – Online at the Internet Archive:
2024
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." Academia 21 Sept. 2020.*
https://www.academia.edu/44135017/
2020
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." ResearchGate 12 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344617564
2020
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan (the Powerful Delude (Themselves)." SSRN 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3687931
2020
Continental Philosophy eJournal 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.ssrn.com/link/Continental-Philosophy.html
2020
Social & Political Philosophy eJournal 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.ssrn.com/link/Social-Political-Philosophy.html
2020
Epistemology eJournal 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.ssrn.com/link/Epistemology.html
2020
Philosophy of Mind eJournal 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.ssrn.com/link/Philosophy-Mind.html
2020
Philosophy of Action eJournal 27 Oct. 2020.*
https://www.ssrn.com/link/Philosophy-Action.html
2020
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." Humanities Commons 7 Nov. 2020.*
https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:33175/
http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/9p6d-cp54
2020
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 8 Nov. 2020.*
https://vanityfea.blogspot.com/2020/11/los-poderosos-se-enganan.html
2020
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." Net Sight de José Angel García Landa 5 Jan. 2023.*
https://personal.unizar.es/garciala/publicaciones/lospoderosos.pdf
2022
_____. "Los poderosos (se) engañan." In García Landa, Vanity Fea 12 Feb. 2026.*
https://blogdenotasvanityfea.blogspot.com/2026/02/los-poderosos-se-enganan.html
2026
—oOo—
Tomen nota de quiénes se felicitan: las FARC, Maduro, China, Morales, ETA, Podemos, Sánchez, ERC y Casado. https://t.co/hZXHO01bqX
— Hermann Tertsch (@hermanntertsch) November 7, 2020